Home > Intel Rapid > Intel Rapid Storage Verification Error

Intel Rapid Storage Verification Error

All RAID volumes are 97.2GB. Is anyone else running Intel RAID 1? For simplicity, I will select the volume capacity (vc) for the RAID 1 or RAID 5 volume first and use 500GB for both in the examples in Table H. My questions: 1) For RAID 1 and RAID 10, what if it's the source that contains corrupted data - will it really copy that corrupted data onto the mirror, causing the this contact form

That is why I am using such a strange number in Table G. For reasons that I won't get into here, the Samsung 750GB drives I was using for testing appear in Windows as 698.6GB drives. If so, find some external RAID enclosure (we often use Star Tech units - they meet (A) above), and attempt to restore the image of your machine to the external RAID, It can take more than 20 minutes for Vista to load.

I seemed to have missed the first four courses. 05-27-2015 09:27 AM « Next Oldest | Next Newest » Possibly Related Threads... At this point, I would suggest the following: 1. Signup now! The RAID 0 and RAID 5 calculation is more complex so let me break it down for you: RAID 0 volume capacity = (# of drives * capacity of smallest drive)

analyzers can't read the data. For example, a 500GB RAID 1 volume rebuild could take more than 1 hour and 40 minutes to complete. An unstable system can also lead to an improper Windows shutdown. GPT partitions are only bootable in EFI-based systems.

Computer enthusiasts looking for faster performance can also benefit from RAID. So i ran the dell support center short and long hard drive tests again and its still saying everything is working properly. Because of this, you don't want to buy three 1TB drives, configure them in a RAID array, and only use 10 percent of the available space in a RAID level with Do not forget to reattach the power and data cables to the drives when you work on the motherboard!

http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Int...P5KE/#download The Intel RST (later versions of Intel Matrix) is not designed for HDDs and the ICH9R chipset. Will report back in 2 weeks. other threads: http://communities.intel.com/thread/19022 http://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/97...cation-errors/ Hardware: ICH9R, Asus P5K-E, 2x80Gb Seagate HDDs OS Software: Win7 HD Tune: verifies each drive ok RAM: verifies 100% with memtest __________________ Q6600 [email protected] (9x380 @ 1.375V)/ I am running Rapid Storage Technology in Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit.

  1. I have swapped in a raid 1 volume made up of 2 ssds (intel 530 240gb) already initialized and verified from another machine, running on the backup server with 2008r2 and
  2. I rebooted; and the IRST decided to run a verify on the array.
  3. Log in / Username Password Verification Stay logged in Login Forgot Your Password?
  4. The RAID 1 volume status was Verifying and Repairing when ripping an MP3 file to a RAID 1 volume.
  5. In order to determine if Intel Matrix RAID is up to the task on a desktop PC, I set off to perform a number of abusive failure tests.
  6. So doesn't doesn't seem really that critical.

What does "it gets old pretty fast" mean in these sentences? The data (including an OS, boot track, etc.) should be fully intact and operate seamlessly unRAIDed. Please add us! Related 1Intel Rapid Storage RAID 5 error, “Missing Drive”2Intel SRT / RST gives “no boot device” error after two reboots3Use Intel Rapid Storage Technology with a secondary PCIe RAID card3How to

Bloody bright sparks at HP still havent learnt this, man am I sick of swapping good drives for nothing..... weblink Go to Page... If you choose RAID 0 for Windows Vista and RAID 1 or RAID 5 for any critical data you can't afford to lose, Intel Matrix RAID is an excellent way to reply go to top #52 | RE: RAID1 Mirror Corruption on 2008 R2 Server with Intel RSTe Controller with Intel SSD Drives Tue May 19, 2015 10:43 am Fernando Show info

Windows clean boot, clean driver install, debug mode, etc. Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away! Having two or three terabytes of disk storage in your system can be really cool, but do you really need that much disk space? navigate here Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post Anyone know of a similar forum for hearing issues?

INFORMATION ON APNEA BOARD FORUMS OR ON APNEABOARD.COM SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS MEDICAL ADVICE. For RAID 1 and RAID 10, it does the following: Data on the mirror is compared to data on the source. ALWAYS SEEK THE ADVICE OF A PHYSICIAN BEFORE SEEKING TREATMENT FOR MEDICAL CONDITIONS, INCLUDING SLEEP APNEA.

The RAID 0 OS and Apps volume status was Normal.

More discussions in Desktop Boards All PlacesSupport CommunityDesktop Boards 10 Replies Latest reply on Jul 31, 2015 11:25 AM by mikec_intel Should I be concerned about RST verification errors? Neither the user's interface nor the help file tells us much about what is going on. I cannot find what they mean by a verification error. ALWAYS SEEK THE ADVICE OF A PHYSICIAN BEFORE SEEKING TREATMENT FOR MEDICAL CONDITIONS, INCLUDING SLEEP APNEA.

Everything runs fine on the OS, so I'm not sure if these are false positives, or indicative of either HDD failure, or a hardware (or driver) fault. It is as if the drivers and RAID controllers Intel has designed offer no protection at all: https://communities.intel.com/thread/55724 Like Show 0 Likes(0) Actions 10. This goes for anyone else using HDDs and Intel, stay away from the RST. his comment is here reply go to top #50 | RE: RAID1 Mirror Corruption on 2008 R2 Server with Intel RSTe Controller with Intel SSD Drives Mon May 18, 2015 6:49 pm StephenDone Show info

Mike C. We recently had a drive failure, and the array would only accept an IDENTICAL brand and model of replacement. I even did a regedit to make sure the MS AHCI driver was starting. I can get everything working with a fresh Win7 install - the system seems fine.

All the recovery processes listed in Table A will have a significant negative impact on performance. Re: Should I be concerned about RST verification errors? I ran this same rig with the same raid 1 on XP for a long time, and never had any problems, but I also never really ran the verify then, only INFORMATION POSTED ON THE APNEA BOARD WEB SITE AND FORUMS ARE PERSONAL OPINION ONLY AND NOT NECESSARILY A STATEMENT OF FACT. 05-27-2015 07:26 AM Donate to Apnea Board AlanE Posts: 1,480

Test number five, process Idle, yielded some interesting results.